E-Waste and Climate Change

The Mounting Crisis of Electronic Waste

Electronic waste has emerged as one of the world’s fastest-growing environmental challenges, creating a complex web of climate impacts that demand immediate global attention. According to the latest Global E-waste Monitor 2024, the world generated a record 62 million tonnes of e-waste in 2022, representing an 82% increase from 2010. This alarming trajectory shows no signs of slowing, with projections indicating e-waste generation will reach 82 million tonnes by 2030—a further 33% increase.

The scale of this crisis becomes even more stark when considering recycling rates. Despite containing valuable materials worth approximately $62 billion, only 22.3% of global e-waste was documented as properly collected and recycled in 2022. This means that nearly 78% of electronic waste remains unaccounted for, ending up in landfills, informal recycling operations, or being illegally traded across borders.

Climate Impact and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Rising Carbon Footprint of E-Waste

The relationship between e-waste and climate change operates through multiple pathways, creating a significant and growing carbon footprint. Research from the University of California, Irvine reveals that greenhouse gas emissions from electronic devices and their associated e-waste increased by 53% between 2014 and 2020. The study documented 580 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2020 alone, with projections suggesting this could reach 852 million metric tons of CO₂ compounds annually by 2030 without proper regulatory intervention.

Multiple Sources of Climate Impact

E-waste contributes to climate change through several interconnected mechanisms:

Manufacturing Emissions: The production of electronic devices is highly energy-intensive, requiring significant extraction of raw materials including rare earth elements, precious metals, and fossil fuel-derived plastics. When devices are prematurely discarded, these embedded carbon costs are essentially wasted.

Landfill Methane Production: When e-waste decomposes in landfills, it produces greenhouse gases including methane and carbon dioxide. Methane is particularly concerning as it is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere.

Incineration Emissions: Burning e-waste, a common practice in informal recycling operations, releases toxic fumes including dioxins and other hazardous chemicals into the atmosphere. These pollutants not only degrade air quality but also contribute to global warming.

Refrigerant Leakage: Temperature exchange equipment such as cooling systems contains refrigerants that are direct sources of greenhouse gases. From 2014 to 2020, GHG emissions from electronic devices and their waste increased significantly, with refrigerants being among the most dangerous contributors.

Resource Depletion and Extraction Impacts

The linear “take-make-dispose” model of electronics consumption creates massive environmental pressure through resource extraction. Mining discarded electronics produces 80% less emissions of carbon dioxide per unit of gold compared with mining it from the ground. However, the reality is that less than 1% of rare earth element demand is currently met by e-waste recycling, forcing continued environmentally destructive mining operations.

The Global Waste Colonialism Problem

Developed Countries Exporting Environmental Burden

One of the most troubling aspects of the global e-waste crisis is the systematic export of electronic waste from developed to developing countries—a practice academics term “waste colonialism”. Between 50-80% of e-waste generated by developed countries is exported to developing nations, often under the guise of “donations” or “recycling” but frequently ending up in environmentally harmful informal processing operations.

Research from the University of Toronto found that emissions in China from 2000 to 2020 were approximately 300 tonnes of toxic chemicals from e-waste processing, with about half linked to imported waste. By comparison, PBDE emissions in Europe during the same period were only about 5.5 tonnes, with more than 100 tonnes offloaded to other parts of the world.

Environmental Justice Implications

This global trade pattern creates severe environmental justice issues. Countries in the Global South bear disproportionate environmental and health burdens from e-waste they did not generate. The United States alone exports more than half of its e-waste to China, while China used to import about 70% of the world’s traded e-waste before implementing restrictions.

The Basel Convention, designed to control hazardous waste trade, has proven insufficient. The Convention exempts secondhand items and some e-waste scrap from regulation, allowing developed countries to continue shipping waste to less developed nations. As of January 1, 2025, new amendments require prior informed consent for both hazardous and non-hazardous e-waste shipments, but enforcement remains challenging.

India’s E-Waste Challenge and Future Prospects

Rapid Growth in E-Waste Generation

India faces a particularly acute e-waste challenge, ranking as the world’s third-largest e-waste generator after China and the United States. The country generated 4.1 million tonnes of e-waste in 2022, with domestic generation increasing dramatically. India’s e-waste surged by 73% in five years, rising from 1.01 million metric tonnes in 2019-20 to 1.751 million MT in 2023-24.

Recycling Infrastructure Gaps

Despite improvements, significant challenges remain in India’s e-waste management system. The proportion of e-waste processed rose from 22% in 2019-20 to 43% in 2023-24. However, this means approximately 57% of e-waste—equivalent to 990,000 metric tonnes—remains unprocessed in the country.

The informal sector dominates e-waste processing in India, with around 90% of all collected electronic waste processed informally in places like Mustafabad in Delhi. While this provides livelihoods for many workers, it also creates significant environmental and health risks due to crude recycling techniques and lack of safety measures.

Policy Framework and Future Projections

India has implemented comprehensive e-waste regulations through the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022, which became effective on April 1, 2023. These rules expand coverage to 100 types of electronic equipment and implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) requirements with annual recycling targets.

Looking ahead, estimates suggest India will generate over 161 million tonnes of e-waste by 2050. However, this challenge also presents opportunities. The economic value of e-waste recycling in India is substantial—1 tonne of mobile phone printed circuit boards can produce about 1.5 kg of gold, compared to only 1.4 g extractable from 1 tonne of ore.

Expert-Recommended Solutions and Best Practices

Circular Economy Approaches

Leading experts advocate for transitioning from linear “take-make-dispose” models to circular economy approaches that emphasize resource recovery and reuse. Research shows that increasing the lifespan of electronics by 50-100% can mitigate up to half of GHG emissions. Key circular economy strategies include:

Extended Product Lifespan: Designing electronics for durability, repairability, and upgradability to reduce the frequency of replacement.

Advanced Recycling Technologies: Implementing sophisticated material recovery systems that can extract precious metals like gold, palladium, and copper with high precision. Automated dismantling stations using robotics and AI can improve efficiency while reducing worker exposure to hazardous materials.

Blockchain for Transparency: Digital ledgers can ensure traceability in the e-waste supply chain, building trust and improving compliance with environmental standards.

Policy and Regulatory Solutions

International frameworks are evolving to address e-waste challenges more effectively. The Basel Convention amendments that took effect January 1, 2025 now require prior informed consent for all e-waste shipments, both hazardous and non-hazardous. However, experts recommend additional measures:

Strengthened EPR Implementation: Countries should adopt comprehensive Extended Producer Responsibility frameworks that hold manufacturers accountable for the entire lifecycle of their products.

International Cooperation: Enhanced coordination between developed and developing countries to ensure environmentally sound e-waste management and prevent illegal dumping.

Investment in Formal Recycling: If countries could bring e-waste collection and recycling rates to 60% by 2030, the benefits would exceed costs by more than US $38 billion.

Technological Innovations

Several breakthrough technologies are transforming e-waste management:

Clean Battery Recycling: Innovative chemical processes can reclaim lithium, cobalt, and nickel from spent batteries, supporting electric vehicle and renewable energy sectors.

AI-Powered Sorting: Advanced separation technologies improve the efficiency and safety of material recovery operations.

Urban Mining: Efficient material recovery from e-waste can result in avoiding 155,000 tonnes of CO₂-equivalents for every 110,000 tonnes of e-waste recycled.

Economic Opportunities and Green Jobs

The transition to sustainable e-waste management presents significant economic opportunities. In India alone, recycling 1,000 kilotonnes of e-waste could generate 6,000 direct full-time jobs in states like Odisha by 2030. The recovered materials can feed into electronics manufacturing, creating circular supply chains that reduce dependence on virgin materials.

Globally, the estimated economic value of metals in e-waste is approximately $91 billion, representing a massive opportunity for value recovery. Companies like Eco Recycling Limited in Maharashtra have achieved recycling capacity of 25,000 tonnes per annum while promoting responsible disposal practices and worker training.

Conclusion and Call to Action

Electronic waste represents one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time, with far-reaching implications for climate change, environmental justice, and global sustainability. The rapid growth in e-waste generation—rising five times faster than documented recycling—demands immediate and coordinated action across all levels of society.

The path forward requires a fundamental shift from linear consumption patterns to circular economy models that prioritize product longevity, material recovery, and responsible disposal. This transformation must be supported by strengthened international cooperation to prevent waste colonialism, robust policy frameworks that hold producers accountable, and significant investment in formal recycling infrastructure.

For countries like India, which face both the challenge of domestic e-waste growth and the burden of imported waste, developing comprehensive management systems offers the dual benefit of environmental protection and economic opportunity. The projected generation of 161 million tonnes of e-waste by 2050 in India alone underscores the urgency of action.

The climate implications of inaction are clear: without proper intervention, e-waste could contribute over 852 million metric tons of CO₂ compounds annually by 2030. However, with proper circular economy approaches and international cooperation, the e-waste challenge can be transformed into an opportunity for sustainable development, green job creation, and climate action.

The time for comprehensive action is now—the future of our planet depends on how effectively we can turn the tide on electronic waste and harness its potential as a resource rather than a burden.

Source: The Hindu

Check : ENVIRONMENT NOTES